Chemotherapy: IO
Episode Notes
Biologic rationale for immunotherapy
Immune Checkpoints: immune checkpoints are ways in which normal/healthy cells (and tumors) avoid destruction by T-lymphocytes
PD-1 is a ligand which is responsible for preventing the immune system from attacking the body’s own tissues; PD-1 is expressed by T cells
PD-L1 is a receptor, expressed by tumors and healthy cells, which turns off the attack signal from T cells when bound to PD-1
Tumors have learned to upregulate expression of PD-L1 to evade the immune system
CTLA-4: receptor expressed in activated T lymphocytes which acts as an off-signal/down-regulator of T cell function
Cancers have learned to directly express CTLA-4 as well as to induce expression of regulatory T cells which heavily express CTLA-4, which helps avoid destruction by activated T cells
Immune checkpoint inhibition exploits the over-expression of immune checkpoints by tumor cells
Currently used:
Anti-PD-1
FDA Approved: Pembrolizumab, dostarlimab
Not yet FDA Approved: Cemiplimab, nivolumab, balstilimab
Anti-PD-L1
FDA approved: Durvalumab
Not yet FDA approved: Atezolizumab, avelumab
Anti-CTLA-4
Not yet FDA approved: Ipilimumab, falifrelimab
Predicting response
MSI: measured via tumor sequencing
MMRd: measured on IHC
TMB: measured via tumor sequencing
Foundation One CDX companion diagnostic
TMB ≥ 10 = “high TMB”
PD-L1: while used to predict response to immunotherapy, this has not been as successful at predicting response as MSI, MMR, TMB; most approvals for IO in gyn cancers are not based on PD-L1
Measured on IHC
Combined positivity score (CPS): PD-L1 expression in both tumor cells and immune cells (lymphocytes, macrophages) compared to the total number of viable tumor cells
CPS ≥ 1 = “positive”
Tumor Proportion Score (TPS): measures proportion of PD-L1 positive tumor cells compared to total number of tumor cells
Not routinely used in gyn cancers
FDA approvals for immunotherapy in gyn cancers
Disease site agnostic
Based on MSI/MMRd status
Pembrolizumab: Based on results of KEYNOTE-158
Approved for patients with solid tumors which are MSIH/MMRd with disease progression following prior systemic therapy in any setting (if not a candidate for curative surgery or radiation)
Based on TMB-H status:
Pembrolizumab: based on the results of KEYNOTE-158
Approved for patients with solid tumors with unresectable or metastatic disease
Disease site specific
Endometrial Cancer
Pembrolizumab: Based on the results of NRG-GY018/KEYNOTE 868
Approved in combination with carbo/taxol, for the treatment of primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer
Approved for up to 2 years of use
See show notes from Uterine part 3 for trial inclusion criteria
Pembrolizumab, pMMR disease: Based on the results of KEYNOTE-775/Study 309
Approved, in combination with lenvatinib, in patients with pMMR disease, for recurrent endometrial cancer
See show notes from Uterine part 3 for trial inclusion criteria
Dostarlimab: Based on the results of ENGOT-EN-6-NSGO/GOG3031/RUBY trial
Approved in patients with advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer
Approved for up to 3 years of use
See show notes from Uterine part 3 for trial inclusion criteria
Durvalumab: for MMRd disease, Based on the results of the DUO-E/GOG-3041/ENGOT-EN10 study
Approved until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity
Approved, in combination with carbo/taxol for patients with advanced endometrial cancer
Cervical Cancer
Pembrolizumab: Based on the results of KEYNOTE-A18
Approved, in combination with chemoradiation, for patients with FIGO 2014 stage III-IVA disease
Pembrolizumab, for PD-L1 positive disease: based on the results of KEYNOTE-826
Approved for patients with PD-L1 positive, advanced disease (persistent/recurrent/metastatic), in combination with chemotherapy (+/- bevacizumab)
This is the only PD-L1 expression specific approval for pembrolizumab
Immune Related Adverse Events (IRAE)
IRAE are considered “off-target” effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (remember that many healthy cells express PD-L1)
Can be a sign that the immune system is responding to the drug; sometimes patients with more IRAE have a stronger oncologic response.
Common: ≥ 70% of patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibition (ICPi) experience some AE
13% experience a grade 3+ event
Targets: any organ, any time!
Most commonly present in weeks to months after starting treatment, but can present even after stopping treatment (even years after)
Because of this, need to suspect IRAE in any patient currently or previously on ICPi
Median time to presentation of IRAE with CTLA-4 inhibition tends to be shorter than with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition.
Most common organ systems: skin, GI, endocrine, lung, liver, cardiovascular, CNS
Patients with earlier onset of AE are at higher risk of re-triggering the IRAE upon rechallenge
Management:
ASCO guidelines: management of IRAE treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Detailed, system-specific, workup and management for IRAE
Because of complexity and breadth of types of presentations of IRAE, rely on this document to help guide management for specific toxicities
General principles (not applicable to all IRAE)
Evaluate the toxicity (H&P, labs, imaging) → consult ASCO guidelines → assign a grade→ treat
Steroids for majority of IRAE
If giving steroids for ≥ 28 days at high doses, consider PPI for stress ulcer prophylaxis, and consider prophylaxis for pneumocystis pneumonia (bactrim vs. alternate)
Management is based on grade
Grade 1: can continue the ICPi
symptomatic /supportive care
Grade 2: Temporarily stop the ICPi
Rechallenge with ICPi once symptoms resolve to ≤grade I severity
Grade 3-4: Stop the ICPi
High dose steroids with steroid taper for 4-6 weeks
If no improvement with high dose steroids in 48-72 hrs, may need to add monoclonal antibodies (eg: IVIG)
Grade 3: consider restarting ICPi once symptoms/labs revert to ≤ grade 1 severity
Consult specialists PRN
Consider restarting with shorter dosing intervals (q3w vs. q6w) in case symptoms recur
Grade 4: permanently discontinue ICPi
Urgent medical evaluation
Typically admit to hospital
High dose steroids as above
If previously on dual checkpoint blockade, consider restarting with monotherapy with the PD-1/PD-L1 agent
Dose adjustments? Generally not indicated for management of toxicities
When to rechallenge?
Symptoms and labs back to ≤ grade I levels
Consider timing with steroid taper
Steroid taper blunts the immune system; restarting the ICPi won’t be effective if patients are immunosuppressed with steroid taper
General principle (based on data from NSLC): consider restarting with total dose is ≤ 10mg prednisone (or equivalent) daily.
Exceptions to general principles
Endocrinopathies: cells producing hormones are often permanently damaged by the ICPi/no longer have the ability to make hormone and can’t recover
Management is based on repletion of hormone specific to the toxicity
Can continue the ICPi/do not need to discontinue, even for high-grade events (because stopping won’t fix or help the problem)
However, continuing the ICPi could still cause other IRAE; make sure to have a risk-benefit discussion with your patients
For thyroiditis, often follows the hyperthyroidism→burnout→hypothyroidism pathway as with other causes of thyroiditis. Treat symptomatically until hypothyroid, at which time you can replete.
Other forms of immunotherapy; none approved in gyn cancers to date
Therapeutic vaccines
Adoptive t cell therapy: tumor infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy.
References
Check out the ASCO Guidelines !